☁️ Azure Did The Impossible

The biggest IPO in history is live — $1.75T valuation, $135 open, $75B raised. And history says the retail investors who chase day-one hype are the ones who get burned.

The SpaceX run created thousands of new millionaires. But it wasn't the people buying at the open. It was the ones positioned early, in the names set to ride the wave.

Our analyst pinpointed 3 stocks positioned to ride the SpaceX wave — with entry guidance and price targets, a bonus 4th pick (the most undervalued name in the sector), and a 3-phase playbook for when to buy and when to sell.

Over 2,500 investors have already read the report. Claim your free copy here.

Get the Free Report

Microsoft's order backlog just hit $678 billion.

That's up 84% in a year, and roughly the size of Belgium's entire economy. Sitting in a queue. Waiting to be billed.

Wall Street noticed. Shares climbed as much as 9% after hours.

Q4, for the period ending June 30:

Those adjusted numbers exclude the OpenAI investment hit. File that away for later.

Azure grew 43% year over year. That's an acceleration, which almost never happens to a business this size. And nobody was expecting it.

Intelligent Cloud pulled in $39.3B, up 32%, comfortably past the $38.17B estimate.

Azure also crossed $100 billion in annual revenue for the first time. Nadella threw in 30 million paid Copilot seats for good measure.

The rest of the software stack held the line:

More Personal Computing, aka Xbox, Windows, Surface and Activision, did $12.9B. Down 4%.

Selling AI to enterprises is going considerably better than selling laptops and consoles to actual humans.

Going in, the market was twitchy about two things: whether the software business could hold up, and whether Azure was stalling out. Both got answered.

So where's the problem? Not in the revenue. In what it costs to produce.

All that cloud growth runs on data centres, chips and electricity. Some analysts think that spend is going to drag on operating profitability for years.

The bull case is now measurable. A $678B backlog is contracted demand.

The bear case is measurable too. Every dollar of growth is being bought with capex, and capex becomes depreciation whether the AI boom keeps going or not.

Next quarter, watch the margins. Azure's growth rate is already the headline everyone expects.

You don't have to scroll every AI thread, track every new tool, or watch every demo. 

The Rundown AI breaks it all down for you — the latest AI news, tools, and tutorials in one free 5-minute email every morning. 

Trusted by 2M+ professionals at Apple, Google, and NASA.

Sign up to start learning.

Meta's expenses just grew 55%. Revenue grew 28%.

You can guess how the market handled that.

Shares fell more than 10% after hours, even though revenue came in at $60.8B, a $510M beat.

Profit landed at $6.18 per share against the $7.19 Wall Street wanted. Operating income dropped 8%.

Blame three things stacking up at once: AI spending, severance from the headcount cull, and lawyers.

The ad machine, meanwhile, is humming:

So the top of the business is fine. The middle is where the money leaks out.

The quarter contained $3.58B of one-off charges from legal proceedings and severance.

Strip those out and operating income actually grew about 9%, to roughly $22.4B.

Two very different stories from one earnings release. Take your pick.

Meta raised the floor on capex. It now expects to spend $130B to $145B this year, up from a $125B starting point.

Full-year expenses are now guided to $165B to $169B, including $2.4B set aside for legal costs.

Why legal? Because Meta flagged youth-related trials in the US this year that "may ultimately result in a material loss." When a company writes that sentence itself, it isn't being dramatic.

Q3 revenue guidance came in at $61B to $64B, sitting right on top of the $63.24B consensus. No promises, no panic.

This is the same movie the market has watched four times now. Meta misses on EPS, confirms it will spend enormous sums on AI, and investors head for the exits before reading page two.

The question that actually matters: does the spending show up as revenue? Management reaffirmed that 2026 operating income will beat 2025, which suggests they think yes.

The bear case is simpler. $145B of capex is a very expensive bet to be wrong about, and the legal overhang has no clean end date.

Nine times since 2015. Nine times higher a month later.

The Nasdaq 100 just printed a chart pattern with a perfect record. And it looks absolutely horrible.

Monday, $QQQ ( ▼ 2.04% ) gapped up more than 1% at the open, then rolled over and closed red.

That is textbook bull trap. Buyers show up, get overrun, everyone goes home poorer.

Commentator Neil Sethi said that kind of price action is what you normally see near a top.

Then the backtest showed up.

Bluekurtic screened the exact setup. Gap up over 1%, close negative, index still within 10% of an all-time high. Nine hits since 2015.

One month later, the Nasdaq 100 was higher all nine times. 100%.

Nine out of nine is a tiny sample. It is also nine out of nine.

So Monday may have been a bear trap wearing a top's costume.

But here is where it gets messy. Wednesday's open had the Nasdaq 100 down 10% from its June peak of 30,660.

Official correction territory, courtesy of a chip selloff that keeps finding new gears.

Notice the problem? The bullish signal only counts while the index sits within 10% of its high.

The Nasdaq is now standing exactly on that line, one bad session away from falling out of its own success story.

Pattern stats like this are astrology with a spreadsheet attached. Nine data points across ten years counts as a fun fact. It does not count as a law of physics.

What the history does suggest: a gap up that dies by lunchtime has not usually been the sound of the ceiling caving in.

The chip selloff is the actual story here. Semis dragged the index into correction, and semis decide whether this bounces or breaks.

Everyone else cares because the Nasdaq 100 has become a concentrated bet on a dozen chip and cloud names.