Sponsored by

In today’s post:

  • 😨 Big Tech's $770B problem

  • πŸ›’ Oil Execs Just Warned Trump

  • 😭 Trump to Israel and Hezbollah: Please Stop

Stop Losing Your Money. It's time to upgrade your trading platform.

Your current trading platform is probably letting you down

  • Limited assets (no international stocks, no commodities, no pre-IPO companies)

  • Limited ability to short

  • Limited access to leverage

  • Limited trading hours

Liquid is one of the fastest growing trading platforms, allowing users to trade stocks, commodities, FX, and more 24/7/365 from their phone and computer.

Trading on Liquid is as simple as:

  1. Pick an asset

  2. Pick long or short

  3. Pick your position size and leverage

  4. Place your trade

The best part is that Liquid markets never close. So no matter what is going on in the world, you are able to keep your portfolio positioned properly.

😨 Big Tech's $770B Problem

Goldman Sachs just dropped a report with a plot twist: the AI boom printing record profits could be the same thing that drags those profits back down.

Wall Street loves a good villain origin story.

Right now, profits are doing the heavy lifting.

The S&P 500 is up 9% this year, even though stocks technically got cheaper on paper.

How? Earnings.

Forward earnings estimates jumped 17%, while the price-to-earnings ratio actually slipped from 22x to 21x.

In plain English? Companies aren't getting more expensive. They're just getting more profitable.

And profitability is everything.

Return on equity (basically, how good a company is at turning money into more money) hit a record 22%.

Goldman's rule of thumb: every 1-point move in ROE moves the market's P/E by roughly one turn.

So if profits wobble, valuations wobble too.

Enter the AI divide.

Not everyone in the AI gold rush is getting rich the same way.

The chipmakers are selling the shovels. Net profit margins near 50%. Pricing power for days.

The cloud giants are digging the mine. And digging is expensive.

Here's the scary number:

Goldman thinks the big cloud players will spend around $770 billion on capex in 2026.

That's roughly 100% of their operating cash flow. Every dollar coming in is going right back out the door.

Data centers don't build themselves, apparently.

So what happens to all that spending?

It hits the books. Depreciation for these hyperscalers is set to climb from 7% of revenue in 2022 to 12% by 2027.

Some are taking on debt and issuing shares to fund it all.

The result? Goldman expects return on equity for the biggest tech names to drop by an average of 7 points next year.

Apple takes the hardest hit, followed by Nvidia, Alphabet, and Meta.

But Goldman isn't calling a funeral.

The bank still sees the long game. Customer backlogs are growing. Margins at cloud providers are expanding. Revenue estimates are climbing.

AI models are also getting cheaper to run as cost-per-token falls and pricing holds steady.

And the bigger prize? Productivity.

More than half of S&P 500 companies talked up AI productivity on recent earnings calls. Few have put real numbers on it yet.

But if AI actually boosts earnings per employee across corporate America, that's a tailwind that lasts.

The real question:

Can record profitability stick around?

Because today's lofty valuations are leaning on it hard. If profits hold, the market's premium price tag makes sense. If they don't, well... you know how that goes.

TL;DR

  • Goldman warns the AI spending boom fueling record profits could eventually drag those profits down.

  • The S&P 500 is up 9% this year, powered by a 17% jump in earnings, not pricier stocks.

  • Chipmakers are winning big (margins near 50%), while cloud giants eat massive AI infrastructure costs.

  • Cloud players may spend ~$770 billion on capex in 2026, about 100% of their operating cash flow.

  • Big Tech's return on equity is expected to fall ~7 points next year, with Apple hit hardest.

  • Long term, Goldman bets AI productivity gains could offset the pain, if record profitability holds.

1. Separate the Shovel-Sellers from the Diggers
Goldman says chipmakers are running ~50% margins while cloud giants burn cash on data centers. Not all "AI stocks" are the same trade.

πŸ“Œ Action: Tilt toward semiconductor exposure via $SMH ( β–² 1.73% ) or $SOXX ( β–² 1.59% ) for the pricing-power story. Trim if your tech weighting is really just disguised capex risk.

2. Watch the Depreciation Cliff
Hyperscaler depreciation jumps from 7% to 12% of revenue by 2027. That quietly eats reported earnings even when revenue looks great.

πŸ“Œ Action: Before next earnings, check free cash flow (not just net income) on names like $MSFT ( β–² 0.1% ), $GOOGL ( β–² 0.53% ), $AMZN ( β–Ό 1.23% ), $META ( β–Ό 0.26% ). Reward the ones still generating cash after the buildout.

3. Don't Pay 21x for Falling ROE
Every 1-point ROE drop tends to drag the market's P/E down ~1 turn. Big Tech ROE is forecast to fall ~7 points next year, Apple worst.

πŸ“Œ Action: Rebalance away from the priciest mega-caps trading on past profitability. Rotate into broad exposure like $RSP ( β–² 0.91% ) (equal-weight S&P) to reduce concentration in the names most exposed.

Learn AI in 5 minutes a day

You don't have to scroll every AI thread, track every new tool, or watch every demo.Β 

The Rundown AI breaks it all down for you β€” the latest AI news, tools, and tutorials in one free 5-minute email every morning.Β 

Trusted by 2M+ professionals at Apple, Google, and NASA.

There's a Chinese tech giant whose AI revenue just crossed a line nobody expected this fast: for the first time ever, more than half of its core business is now AI.

One segment inside it grew 184% year-over-year. Not the company. One business line. Triple digits, in a single quarter.

And here's the part that makes no sense: the stock is cheap. It trades at 12.7X forward earnings β€” barely a tick above its biggest rival, despite running fatter margins and growing faster.

Oh, and it's sitting on $40.5 billion in cash. Enough to buy back 16% of its own shares and barely feel it.

So why is it trading at a discount? Because the U.S. slapped it with a label that spooked the market. We think the crowd is reading the situation completely wrong.

In today's Premium deep dive, we break down:

  • Why the "military threat" label is a buying opportunity, not a red flag

  • The exact valuation math behind our target (and what would make us walk away)

  • The single risk that could sink the entire thesis

  • The chip spin-off catalyst most investors haven't priced in yet

πŸ‘‰ Unlock the full breakdown

πŸ›’ Oil Execs Just Warned Trump

Oil execs just gave the Trump administration a heads-up nobody wanted: pump prices could spike hard in the coming months.

The reason? Fuel inventories are running on fumes.

Some of the commercial and government stockpiles that kept prices from going nuts could be gone within weeks.

Bad timing too. Peak summer travel season is basically here.

Think of it like a phone at 4% battery, right as you're about to leave the house. Not ideal.

One energy analyst put it bluntly: the White House knows. And said there's "nearly universal alarm" among oil companies and analysts about where prices are headed.

And the backdrop isn't pretty.

Inflation just hit a three-year high, with the consumer price index climbing 4.2% in the year ending May. A big driver? You guessed it. Gas.

Where prices stand right now:

  • $4.11/gal on Friday (per AAA)

  • Down from May's $4.49 average

  • Still way up from last year's $3.12

So why isn't the White House panicking?

Crude oil hasn't blasted past $100 a barrel yet, so some officials are treating the warnings as a bit of crying wolf.

But here's the catch. The execs aren't worried about today's price. They're worried about how fast the supply is draining.

When do the reserves actually run dry? Somewhere between the end of this month and the end of summer.

AKA nobody knows exactly when the tank hits empty, just that the needle's dropping fast.

TL;DR

  • Oil execs warned the Trump administration that gas prices could surge as fuel inventories hit critical lows.

  • Key stockpiles could be wiped out within weeks, right as summer travel peaks.

  • Inflation already hit a 4.2% annual rate in May, with gas a major driver.

  • Gas averaged $4.11/gal Friday, down from May but well above last year's $3.12.

  • The White House response is mixed, since crude hasn't topped $100/barrel yet.

  • The real worry isn't the current price, it's how quickly supply is declining.

😭 Trump to Israel and Hezbollah: Please Stop

Sunday brought a new Truth Social post from President Trump, and this one came with a plea.

Stop shooting.

His message was blunt: no more Israeli attacks in Lebanon, and no more Hezbollah attacks on Israel.

Then he added the kicker: "This could be the beginning of a long and beautiful peace. Let's not blow it."

Translation? Everybody calm down before this gets expensive.

Why your portfolio should care

Here's the thing about the Middle East. It's where a lot of the world's oil lives.

When the region gets shaky, oil gets pricey. When oil gets pricey, everything from your gas tank to your airfare feels it.

A wider war involving Israel, Iran, and Hezbollah could choke energy supplies and spike crude.

So markets watch this stuff like a hawk watches a field mouse.

Good news on diplomacy? Stocks tend to like it.

Fresh fighting? Investors sprint toward safe havens and commodities go for a rollercoaster ride.

The "we're so close" claim

Trump also said the US is very close to a deal with Iran to cool things down.

The catch? Iran isn't nodding along.

Tehran pushed back on the idea that a deal could be wrapped up in days. Their stance: talks are still talks, and nothing's signed.

Meanwhile, actual rockets were still flying.

Israel struck Beirut on Sunday, saying it was answering Hezbollah rocket fire into northern Israel. Lebanese media reported casualties.

Iran warned those strikes wouldn't go unanswered.

So we've got peace talks and live fire happening at the same time. Cute.

What's actually on the table

The US and Iran have been chatting through middlemen like Pakistan and Qatar.

Per Bloomberg, several draft versions of an agreement are floating around. They mostly agree on the headline stuff:

  • A ceasefire

  • Reopening the Strait of Hormuz (the chokepoint a huge chunk of global oil sails through)

  • Easing limits on Iranian oil exports

  • Bigger talks on Iran's nuclear program

The agreement everyone wants. The fine print nobody agrees on.

Where it falls apart: money

The fight is over cash. Specifically, how much and how fast.

Some drafts hand Iran big access to frozen assets right away. Others say "earn it" by making progress in future talks.

One draft Bloomberg saw floated a reconstruction program worth at least $300 billion if a final deal lands.

Other reports say Iran wants tens of billions in frozen funds unlocked as part of the process.

That's not a rounding error. That's the whole argument.

Why oil traders are glued to this

If a deal restores Iranian crude exports or reopens Hormuz, the ripple effects are massive.

Think oil producers, refiners, airlines, and anything sensitive to inflation.

More oil flowing usually means cheaper oil. Cheaper oil cools inflation. Cooler inflation makes a lot of people very happy.

For now, both sides seem to agree on the easy part: stop fighting, keep talking.

The hard part, who gets paid what, is still wide open.

TL;DR

  • Trump publicly urged Israel and Hezbollah to halt attacks and floated a "beautiful peace" with Iran.

  • Iran pushed back, saying talks continue and no deal is signed yet.

  • Fighting kept going anyway: Israel hit Beirut, Iran vowed a response.

  • Draft deals agree on a ceasefire, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and easing Iranian oil export limits.

  • The sticking point is money: how much frozen-asset access and sanctions relief Iran gets, and when.

  • Markets care because a deal could boost oil supply, ease prices, and cut geopolitical risk.

What did you think of today's update?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading