China Just Saved Apple 🍎

If you're a digital asset investor with over $50k on Coinbase, this might ruin your day.

Every time you buy Bitcoin, Coinbase takes a cut. Every time you sell, Coinbase takes a cut. When you panic sell at the bottom — cut. When you FOMO buy at the top — cut.

They don't care if digital assets go to the moon or zero. They collect either way.

Visa made $36 billion last year being a middleman. Mastercard made $28 billion. PayPal made $30 billion. 

Nearly $100 billion from three companies that don't produce anything — they just sit between two parties and collect.

The middleman always wins. 

And there's now a way for you to become one.

Tan Gera, CFA Charterholder and ex-Wall Street banker, built the ABN System — a three-phase wealth generating system inspired by BlackRock and used by 4,000+ investors. 

At it’s core is fee generation. 

Up market, down market, sideways — you collect regardless.

Click here to watch the free presentation now →

For educational purposes only. Results will vary. DM Intelligence LLC is not liable for losses. 

Apple just dropped its best March quarter ever, crushed Wall Street's expectations on almost every metric, and the market's response?

A 1.1% after-hours dip.

Welcome to modern investing, where good news is never good enough.

The numbers were genuinely impressive.

Revenue hit $111.18B, up 17% year-over-year, beating the $109.66B estimate. EPS came in at $2.01, clearing the $1.96 forecast with room to spare.

Here's where it gets interesting — every single segment beat.

China was the real story. Revenue from Greater China surged 28% YoY to $20.5B, smashing the $18.91B estimate.

Tim Cook called it Apple's "best March quarter ever" and credited the iPhone 17 lineup, the newly launched MacBook Neo, and the M4-powered iPad Air for driving demand.

Services hit yet another all-time record. At $31B a quarter, it's basically a Fortune 500 company hiding inside a phone manufacturer.

The shareholder returns were solid too.

Apple bumped its quarterly dividend 4% to $0.27 per share, payable May 14. The board also greenlit another $100B share buyback program.

One analyst called the dividend increase "another annual small increase" — which is fair — but a $100B buyback authorization is not something you shrug off. That's Apple saying: we still think we're cheap.

Q3 is where things get trickier. Tougher year-over-year comparisons kick in, and the performance of the MacBook Neo is being flagged as critical by analysts. The product's generating buzz… but buzz has to convert to units.

The real test isn't what Apple just did. It's what it does when the comparisons stop being easy.

1. Buy the Dip on AAPL
The market punished Apple for beating every single estimate. That's not a fundamental problem — that's an overreaction. When great companies drop on great news, that's often the entry point you've been waiting for.

📌 Action: Add or initiate a position in $AAPL ( ▲ 0.44% ) on weakness. Set a target around the next earnings cycle when MacBook Neo data comes in.

2. Ride the Services Mega-Trend
Apple Services hit $31B in a single quarter and is still growing at 16% YoY. This is recurring, high-margin revenue that the market consistently undervalues. It's not a phone company anymore.

📌 Action: If you're not comfortable with AAPL directly, consider a broad tech ETF with heavy Apple weighting like $QQQ ( ▲ 0.93% ) or $VGT ( ▲ 0.05% ) to capture the Services growth story.

3. Watch China as a Leading Indicator
A 28% YoY revenue surge from Greater China is a massive signal and it's not just an Apple story. It suggests consumer demand in China is recovering faster than most expect.

📌 Action: Use this as a cue to look at China consumer exposure ETFs like $KWEB ( ▲ 2.71% ) or $FXI ( ▲ 1.24% ). If Apple is selling this well there, the broader recovery trade may just be getting started.

It's possible—if you know the access paths most people don't know exist. Discover what retail investors can legally access before a company goes public and the positioning strategies to use before volatility begins.

Show me how

Tesla just rolled the first Semi off its new high-volume production line at Gigafactory Nevada.

And yes, that's a big deal. This isn't a one-off prototype. This is the line meant to actually scale.

Tesla posted the news on X with the message "First Semi off high volume line" — deliveries are expected to start later this year.

Quick backstory (the short version):

So forgive us if we're cautiously optimistic.

Now for the numbers that matter.

The Semi comes in two flavours:

Compare that to the competition:

Tesla is the cheapest option in the segment. By a stretch.

If you're a fleet operator choosing between a $290k Tesla and a $400k Daimler, that's not really a choice. That's a spreadsheet that sells itself.

The real question isn't whether Tesla can build the truck. It's whether they can build enough of them, fast enough, to matter.

The EU is taking another swing at fixing its semiconductor problem.

A revamped Chips Act II is expected to drop in late May. And this time Brussels wants the power to invest directly in chip manufacturing plants… not just wave money at member states and hope for the best.

The original Chips Act, launched in 2023, was basically a middleman operation. The European Commission could fund research and rubber-stamp national aid packages, but couldn't actually write cheques to build fabs. The new draft changes that.

Under the proposal, the Commission could co-invest in large, cross-border manufacturing projects as a direct partner. Public-private partnerships, but with Brussels actually at the table.

The EU set an ambitious target: control 20% of global chip production by 2030. The starting point was around 10%. The European Court of Auditors now estimates the bloc will hit roughly 12% — meaning after billions in incentives, they've barely moved the needle.

Intel's collapse didn't help. In 2024 it paused its Poland and Germany projects, including a planned €30B Dresden facility that was supposed to be the crown jewel of the whole programme.

The structural problem was always funding math.

The Commission only directly controlled €4.5B of the total €86B package. The rest relied on national governments and private chipmakers to show up. They largely didn't. And the companies that did apply complained about bureaucratic delays stacking up across multiple approval layers.

Chips Act II also wants to boost the broader supply chain — machinery, materials, circuit boards. The stuff that makes chipmaking possible, not just the chips themselves.

Nothing is final. The proposal still needs multiple rounds of negotiation between EU governments and the European Parliament before it becomes law. Rules could change significantly before then.