Sponsored by

In today’s post:

In March 2000, Cisco was worth more than any company on Earth. Within two years it had lost over 80%. Now the same crowd is piled into a few AI giants. See the 10 stocks we’d own before it turns. See the 10 Stocks Free

🤖 Grok Helped Plan What?

"Lawyer up."

That was the whole message the incoming House Oversight chair sent Big Tech on election night. Two words. No emoji needed.

Democrats just won the House and the Senate, and the subpoena printers are warming up.

According to The Washington Post, they're lining up investigations into Apple, Meta and businesses linked to Elon Musk.

Here's the hit list…

🔍 What's On The Charge Sheet

The probes will look at corporate dealings with the Trump administration and controversial business practices over the past two years.

Early items under consideration:

  • Grok goes to Venezuela: Trump reportedly used Musk's AI chatbot Grok while planning the operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

  • Apple's App Store: hosting tracking apps used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

  • Meta's data centers: using nondisclosure agreements in talks with local governments over data center projects.

Your chatbot helps you write passive-aggressive emails. The President's reportedly helped plan a capture operation. Different tiers.

🎤 The Trash Talk Has Started

Democrats are not being subtle about this:

  • Rep. Ronald Garcia (D-Calif.): "Lawyer up."

  • Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.): told tech execs they'll need to plant new forests to cover all the subpoenas.

  • Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.): took aim at Silicon Valley titans who build themselves bunkers while warning their own AI could wipe out humanity.

  • Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed (Mich.): promised to take on "the corporations and the billionaires."

Somewhere, a paper company is having its best week in years. 🌲

⚖️ Washington Lawyers Just Got Very Busy

Companies and executives are already getting legal advice on how to handle subpoenas, public hearings and requests for information.

Jamie Bair, head of the congressional investigations practice at Crowell and Moring, says control of both chambers means probes are expected to move quickly.

"This is the story on everybody's mind," he said.

Robert Kelner of Covington & Burling went full Game of Thrones: "We've been telling clients all year that winter is coming. Now winter has arrived." ❄️

Another lawyer at a big Washington firm warned execs in a private meeting that if your company gets dragged in, expect it to be much more highly publicized.

Bring a good suit and a better PR team.

🧠 What Does This Mean For Your Money?

Should you panic because a senator posted about forests? Probably not.

Investigations make headlines a lot faster than they change earnings. Hearings and subpoenas cost time, legal fees and executive attention, but on their own they rarely move a company's cash flow much.

What they do create is headline risk. One bad hearing clip can knock a stock around for a few days.

If you own an S&P 500 index fund, you already own a slice of this drama. Apple and Meta are among the biggest names in it.

The real thing to watch is whether these probes turn into actual legislation or regulatory action. That's when it starts to matter for the numbers.

Until then, it's mostly noise. Very loud, very televised noise.

Login or Subscribe to participate

Invest Alongside a $12B Owner/Operator

Choose individual real estate investments backed by a $12B owner/operator that invests 20%+ alongside individual LPs  in every offering.

Accredited Investors only. $100k minimum investment.

This communication is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made exclusively through the definitive offering documents. All investments involve risk of loss, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Any targeted returns or projections are forward-looking statements, are based on current assumptions, and are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially.

The market is pricing this AI landlord for a disaster.

Its customers just signed $20 billion of contracts.

One of those two is wrong.

The stock has slid from a high around $75. Meanwhile, the company booked $200M in Q3 AI cloud revenue and still forecasts $4B+ ARR by January 2027.

That's two months away.

$13B of that backlog comes from two of the biggest names in AI.

Why does the demand keep coming? AI's real bottleneck is power, and this company has already locked in over 5 GW. Customers who can't build fast enough rent from whoever has the power.

The "delay" that spooked everyone? The company says the customer asked for upgrades.

In today's Premium+ deep dive:

  • Whether the selloff is pricing the business or just a headline

  • The contract pricing detail the headline ARR guidance doesn't capture

  • The one state-level risk that could break the thesis, and how real it is

  • Where we've landed, and exactly what would change our mind

💰 $1.25T For A Chatbot

OpenAI is now worth $1.25 trillion.

That's roughly $150 for every person on Earth. And the company isn't even on a stock exchange.

💰 The Raise

OpenAI just closed an $11 billion funding round, according to Bloomberg.

That money pushed the ChatGPT maker's valuation to $1.25T. It's now in the trillion-dollar club without ever ringing an opening bell.

There's a catch, though. OpenAI originally wanted $30 billion or more.

So it raised about a third of what it asked for. Imagine asking for a Ferrari and getting the key fob.

But the round isn't finished.

A source told Bloomberg that the round could climb to $20 billion once the rest closes in the coming weeks.

That's still short of $30B. Only in AI could "only $20 billion" count as a letdown.

🧠 What It Means For You

You can't buy OpenAI shares in your brokerage app. So why should you care?

Because private AI valuations set the tone for public AI stocks. When investors pay a trillion-plus for OpenAI, it shows they still believe in the AI spending boom.

The gap between the $30B target and the $11B raised is worth watching. If the full amount never turns up, that suggests even AI's biggest believers have a limit.

The AI money printer is still running. It's just printing a bit slower than OpenAI wanted.

💔 Microsoft Is Breaking Up

Microsoft just passed on a deal worth tens of billions of dollars.

The money would have gone to Nscale, a British AI cloud company. Microsoft decided against expanding their agreement at a Texas data center.

For Nscale, that's the kind of contract you frame and hang in reception. Now it's a "thanks, but we're good" email.

And Nscale isn't the only one getting ghosted.

📴 Oracle Gets Unplugged

Microsoft is winding down a deal to rent AI computing power from Oracle, Bloomberg reported on Friday.

It's been quietly switching off Oracle's servers for months, after choosing not to renew the contract.

The deal was announced in 2023. Oracle's servers were meant to power the AI-assisted version of Bing. (Yes, Bing. It's still alive.)

The full value of the deal was never made public.

So why pull the plug? The servers ran on older-generation Nvidia chips and no longer met Microsoft's requirements.

In AI, last-gen chips age like milk left in a hot car.

🧠 Why Microsoft Is Getting Picky

Microsoft is getting more cautious about renting computing power from third-party AI providers. Its worries:

  • Project delays

  • Regulatory hurdles

  • Rising costs

Meanwhile, it's putting more money into building its own data centers.

Think renting vs. owning. Rent, and you're stuck with whatever ancient boiler the landlord installed. Own, and you pick the boiler.

Microsoft wants to pick the boiler.

💸 What It Means For You

The AI spending boom is still very much on. But the biggest buyers are getting choosier about where their money goes.

That matters if you follow companies that rent out AI computing power. Their growth can depend heavily on a handful of giant customers.

When one of those giants walks, it leaves a crater.

It's also a reminder that AI hardware gets old fast. Servers that were cutting-edge a few years ago can turn into very expensive furniture.

So the question for any AI infrastructure story is simple: who are the customers, and what happens if they leave?

A CRM so smart, it updates itself.

HubSpot's CRM is so smart, it now updates itself. Calls get logged and summarized the moment they end. New leads get researched and a first outreach drafted, automatically. Deals move forward on their own, with next steps flagged before you have to ask. 

Even the one repetitive task you've been meaning to fix can now run itself, no code required. Customers using it are already seeing the difference. 

This isn't the CRM you have to work hard to figure out. It's the one already working before you log in.

What did you think of today's update?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Reply

Avatar

or to participate