In partnership with

In today’s post:

  • πŸ˜• Iran Says It Never Happened

  • πŸ† Tesla Won By Losing

  • 🀨 Burry Smells A Marketing Ploy

The AI Buildout Needs These 10 Stocks

You don’t have to buy OpenAI or Anthropic to invest in AI. Each large language model requires specialized technology to keep running and growing.

MarketBeat’s The Infrastructure’s Backbone: 10 Stocks Powering the AI Buildout report reveals 10 companies supplying the memory, storage, connectivity, fabrication, power, and cooling behind AI’s next phase.

πŸ˜• Iran Says It Never Happened

Trump posted on Truth Social. Stocks jumped. Then Iran said it never happened.

That's Monday morning, compressed.

The post called Iran a "failing nation" that "wants to make a deal, quickly and badly." Trump added that he'll decide whether the U.S. engages, and that he's open to the concept.

Major U.S. averages ticked higher within minutes of it going live.

πŸ“ˆ Why One Post Moved An Entire Market

Because markets have been holding their breath over the Strait of Hormuz.

The conflict has been on-again, off-again, and every flare-up has disrupted energy flows through that one narrow channel.

So the second any hint of de-escalation appears, traders buy first and read later. Nobody signed anything. Somebody just typed something.

Iranian state-linked outlet Tasnim News dismissed the whole thing.

Their line: Iran has repeatedly made clear it isn't seeking talks with the U.S., and Trump is distorting where Tehran actually stands.

So one side says a deal is close and the other says there are no talks. Very reassuring.

Worth noting Trump has run this play before, calling Tehran eager to negotiate while questioning whether Iran would honour any accord it signed.

🧠 What This Means For Your Money

Monday's move was priced off a post.

Nothing changed in the physical world. No tanker route reopened. No document got signed. A message went up and the market read it as risk-on.

That's the thing about geopolitical rallies. They can unwind on the next headline just as fast as they arrived.

Everything still hangs on the same unresolved question, which is whether energy can move through Hormuz without incident. Until that's answered, oil and equities will keep getting yanked around by whoever posts last.

Meanwhile the economic calendar keeps grinding away in the background. No drama, no rally, still the thing deciding most of this.

100 Genius Side Hustle Ideas

Don't wait. Sign up for The Hustle to unlock our side hustle database. Unlike generic "start a blog" advice, we've curated 100 actual business ideas with real earning potential, startup costs, and time requirements. Join 1.5M professionals getting smarter about business daily and launch your next money-making venture.

The most indebted cruise line on the water just quietly changed how it makes money.

Everyone is staring at $13.89 billion of long-term debt and a leverage ratio of 6.2x, about three times its largest rival's. Understandable.

Here's what that noise is drowning out.

Q2 revenue came in at $2.64 billion, up 5%. Passenger ticket sales grew a limp 1%. Onboard spending jumped 13% to $910.7 million.

Same ships, same crowd, spending considerably more once the gangway is behind them.

The company now owns a 270-acre private island in the Bahamas, complete with a 170-foot tidal tower, reachable only by buying a ticket on its own ships. Own the destination, own the wallet that lands on it. And CLIA still projects record passenger volumes every year through 2029, around 42 million sailings.

A balance sheet that frightens people, bolted to a business getting better at extracting cash.

We're watching this one closely. Inside today's Premium+ breakdown:

  • The exact leverage level that would make us walk away

  • What that 13% onboard number says that the booking data hides

  • Why the island matters more to pricing power than the earnings call let on

  • The one scenario that breaks the entire setup, and how seriously we're taking it

πŸ† Tesla Won By Losing

Tesla now sells more than half the EVs in America.

It got there by selling fewer cars.

Tesla captured 52% of U.S. EV sales through August, up from 43% a year earlier, according to Motor Intelligence data reported by The Wall Street Journal.

More than every other EV brand in the country combined.

πŸ† So How Do You Gain Share While Losing Customers?

You let everyone else lose faster.

Tesla's U.S. sales fell 16% to 325,351 vehicles. Ugly. Except the overall EV market shrank 30%.

Losing less than the field is still winning the field. It's just a strange trophy to hold up.

Rewind twelve months and Tesla looked finished. Its share hit a record-low 41% in 2025 as rivals flooded the market with new models and Elon Musk's political side quest cost him a chunk of the buyer pool.

Then the rivals walked off the pitch.

πŸšͺ Everybody Else Quit The Party

Federal EV incentives expired, the maths stopped working, and Ford $F ( β–Ό 0.79% ) and GM $GM ( β–² 1.8% ) started quietly reversing out of the driveway.

The casualty list of models being killed or phased out:

  • Honda Prologue

  • Volkswagen ID.4

  • Ford F-150 Lightning

GM also cut production plans for the revived Chevy Bolt, and Nissan delayed the cheapest version of its new Leaf.

Tesla didn't out-innovate anyone here. It just stayed in the building.

πŸš— One Car Is Carrying The Entire Company

The Model Y accounted for roughly one-third of all U.S. EV purchases. Not a third of Tesla's. A third of everyone's.

Sales dipped just 2% while the market fell off a cliff. Tesla even stretched it into a six-seat Model Y L this summer.

Now look at the rest of the lineup.

Model 3 sales dropped 34%. Cybertruck managed 9,769 units, which is about 3% of Tesla's own U.S. volume and a rounding error on a truck that was supposed to be a category killer.

The Model S and Model X? Discontinued. No direct replacements. Musk has moved on to robotaxis and humanoid robots.

So the whole American car business now balances on one SUV and a lot of promises.

🧠 What This Means For Your Money

A bigger slice of a smaller pie is still a real advantage. Tesla's competitive position genuinely strengthened, and analysts expect it to keep its dominant U.S. spot while legacy carmakers stay spooked on EV spending.

What it doesn't fix is demand. Buyers are leaving the category, and Tesla's earnings still depend heavily on selling metal boxes with wheels.

Which puts the long-term story on autonomous driving, AI and robotics actually turning into revenue. That's the bet now, whether investors signed up for it or not.

Three things would shift the picture: cheaper battery tech, renewed regulatory support, or a real recovery in consumer appetite. Until one of those shows up, the competitive threat stays parked.

🀨 Burry Smells A Marketing Ploy

Michael Burry thinks the AI doomsday talk is a marketing campaign.

The guy who shorted the housing bubble just aimed at OpenAI, Anthropic and every other lab currently asking the world to please slow them down before they hurt someone.

His verdict on the whole genre: "self-serving."

Here's the argument πŸ‘‡

🧨 Burry's Four Shots

He posted four reasons he isn't buying it:

  • Large language models aren't really AI and won't become AGI, so there's no runaway train to slow down

  • A slowdown protects whoever is already in front, and competition is closing fast

  • IPOs run on hype, and "we're so good we might be dangerous" is premium-grade hype

  • The warnings give cover for growth that's cooling on its own while listings get delayed

That last one is the spicy bit. Burry is suggesting the danger narrative is load-bearing for the valuation.

πŸ“„ The Timing Nobody Can Un-Notice

OpenAI and Anthropic both filed initial IPO paperwork with the SEC earlier this summer.

Then Sam Altman said OpenAI won't actually list this year, calling it an "ill-advised moment."

So: paperwork in, listing out, apocalypse chatter up. Burry's read is that the third thing keeps investors warm while the second thing slips.

🀝 The Inconvenient Part For Burry

The slowdown chorus is not two guys with a book to sell.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei argued in a weekend essay that capability progress should be slowed. Altman publicly agreed on pacing the frontier. Elon Musk's contribution was three words: "Dario is right."

Microsoft's Satya Nadella has backed deliberate pacing so alignment gets designed in rather than bolted on. Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis has supported coordinated slowdowns if risks build, and in July called for a US-led global watchdog to screen the most advanced models.

That's a lot of rivals agreeing on something that supposedly only helps incumbents. Then again, they're all incumbents.

🧠 What This Means For Your Money

There are two stories on the table and you can't verify either from the outside.

Story one: the people building it know something scary and are saying so out loud.

Story two: caution is the cheapest marketing a pre-IPO company can buy.

Both can be partly true at once. What's worth watching is whether the safety talk survives contact with an actual listing. Companies rarely go on roadshows advertising how dangerous their product is.

The wider signal here is simpler. When the loudest bear in finance starts arguing the AI story is running on narrative rather than numbers, the numbers are the thing to go check. Revenue growth, capex, and whether the compute bills ever start paying for themselves.

Burry has been early before. He's also been wrong before. Usually in that order.

Blu Dot surpasses 2,000% ROAS with self-serve CTV ads

Home furniture brand Blu Dot blew up on CTV with help from Roku Ads Manager. Here’s how:

After a test campaign reached 211,000 households and achieved 1,010% ROAS, the brand went all in to promote its annual sales event. It removed age and income constraints to expand reach and shifted budget to custom audiences and retargeting, where intent was strongest.

The results speak for themselves. As Blu Dot increased their investment by 10x, ROAS jumped to 2,308% and more page-view conversions surpassed 50,000.

β€œFor CTV campaigns, Roku has been a top performer,” said Claire Folkestad, Paid Media Strategist, Blu Dot. β€œComping to our other platforms, we have seen really strong ROAS… and highly efficient CPMs, lower than any other CTV partner we've worked with.”

Using Roku Ads Manager, the campaign moved from a pilot to a permanent performance engine for the brand.

What did you think of today's update?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Reply

Avatar

or to participate