One Exit Changed Oil Forever 📈

Before a restaurant sells any food, they need to buy it. That costs up to 35% on every dollar.

But Tipsy Putt’s business model cuts that number to less than 20%.

It’s called “Eatertainment,” the same model that turned TopGolf and Bowlero into billion-dollar companies.

Tipsy Putt is on a mission to dominate the mini golf slice of the Eatertainment space. Their mini golf, craft cocktails, and local eats have already drawn 5,000+ active members. And out of those three revenue streams, the highest-margin one (mini golf) requires no inventory whatsoever.

The result?

Now, they’re bringing this model to San Francisco, America's #3 foodie city. It’s going to address a Bay Area market of 7 million people. You can get up to 32% bonus shares in Tipsy Putt’s SF flagship location.

I’m Ready to Invest

^{This is a paid advertisement for Tipsy Putt Regulation CF offering. Please read the offering circular at https://invest.tipsyputt.com/}

The United Arab Emirates has left OPEC.

Not a rumour. Not a threat. Done.

What is OPEC? A group chat of oil-producing countries that agree on how much oil to sell (so they can all charge you more for it.)

UAE Energy Minister Suhail Al Mazrouei told CNBC it followed a "very careful and long review"… which is diplomat-speak for we've wanted out for a while.

The core reason: flexibility.

The UAE has a target of pumping 5 million barrels per day by 2027. OPEC's production quotas were getting in the way of that, plus the country's gas and petrochemical ambitions.

When you're that ambitious, a cartel telling you to slow down gets old fast.

The minister was quick to say this isn't a beef with Riyadh. Called it a "pure policy change." Expressed "continued respect" for OPEC members.

Sure. Very respectful. Also very done with OPEC.

Here's the context that makes this spicy.

The Strait of Hormuz is still closed. Global supply is already stretched. The minister argued that's actually why the exit is fine. The UAE pumping freely helps consumers, not hurts them.

"We need to be on the side of the consumer," he said.

Noble framing. Also extremely convenient timing.

Markets didn't overthink it.

Oil jumped 3.5%, pushing crude just under the $100/barrel mark.

Investors read the UAE exit as a crack in OPEC's coordination — less discipline, tighter supply, higher prices.

Energy stocks led the entire S&P 500 on Tuesday.

Top 10 S&P 500 energy movers:

ETFs catching the wave: Energy: $XLE ( ▲ 1.66% ), $VDE ( ▲ 1.57% ), $XOP ( ▲ 1.28% ), $OIH ( ▲ 0.5% ), $AMLP ( ▲ 1.17% ), $IXC ( ▲ 1.29% ) Oil: $USO ( ▲ 3.62% ), $UCO ( ▲ 2.48% ), $DBO ( ▲ 2.18% ), $OILK ( ▲ 1.38% ), $USL ( ▲ 1.4% ) Natural Gas: $UNG ( ▼ 1.53% ), $BOIL ( ▼ 2.64% ), $UNL ( ▼ 1.08% )

1. Ride the Oil Supply Squeeze
The UAE leaving OPEC chips away at production discipline. With the Strait of Hormuz still closed and crude already flirting with $100, the supply story isn't going away anytime soon.

📌 Action: Add exposure to oil ETFs like $USO ( ▲ 3.62% ) or $UCO ( ▲ 2.48% ) on any pullback. The trend is still pointing up.

2. Stack the Energy Producers
Markets rewarded E&P stocks across the board on Tuesday. If oil holds near $100, companies like $OXY ( ▲ 2.34% ), $DVN ( ▲ 2.66% ), and $XOM ( ▲ 1.6% ) print bigger margins with every barrel they sell.

📌 Action: Build a small basket of 2–3 energy producers. $OXY ( ▲ 2.34% ) and $XOM ( ▲ 1.6% ) are the safer bets. $DVN ( ▲ 2.66% ) has more upside if oil runs.

3. Let the UAE Do the Work via Midstream
The UAE wants 5M barrels per day by 2027. More production means more pipelines, more infrastructure, more cash flow for midstream players — regardless of where oil prices land.

📌 Action: Look at $KMI ( ▲ 2.71% ) or $OKE ( ▲ 2.33% ) for steadier, lower-volatility exposure. You get energy upside without betting directly on the oil price.

While most investors chase the same overpriced mega-caps, a handful of under-$10 stocks are quietly showing signs of a turnaround. Our analysts identified 10 with real upside that Wall Street hasn't caught on to yet.

The names, the numbers, and the case for each are all in The 10 Best Cheap Stocks to Own in 2026 report.

View the 7 Stocks

JPMorgan's CEO doesn't do panic. So when Jamie Dimon walks into an investment conference and says "there will be some kind of bond crisis"… you listen.

He's not saying the sky is falling. He's saying the ladder is already wobbling.

Here's his actual quote, stripped of the politeness:

"The way it's going now, there will be some kind of bond crisis, and then we'll have to deal with it."

His bigger gripe? That policymakers are playing "wait and see" with a problem that's very much seeable right now.

"Maturity should say you should deal with it, as opposed to letting it happen."

What he’s really saying? Adults in the room, where are you?

Dimon flagged a growing pile of risks that could collide at the worst moment:

The scary part isn't any one of these. It's that nobody knows which combination lights the fuse.

"We don't know what confluence of events causes the problem." — Dimon, basically describing a financial game of Jenga.

He's not losing sleep over whether America can handle a crisis when it arrives. He's losing sleep over the fact that it doesn't have to arrive at all.

Ray Dalio thinks wealth taxes could blow up the market.

Not because rich people hate taxes (they do), but because of how wealth actually works.

Most billionaire-level wealth isn't sitting in a bank account. It's locked up in stocks, real estate, and private investments. Assets, not cash.

So when the tax bill arrives? They have to sell something to pay it.

That's where it gets messy.

Dalio's argument is simple: forced selling = downward pressure on prices. Do that at scale, across thousands of high-net-worth individuals, and you've got a self-reinforcing spiral.

He's seen it before. During past market bubbles, liquidity crunches triggered waves of asset sales. Which accelerated the very crash everyone was trying to avoid.

A poorly timed wealth tax? Same energy.

Now add AI to the mix. Dalio is genuinely bullish on it. He thinks it'll supercharge productivity and cut long-term costs.

But the flip side is ugly. Mass job displacement. A wider gap between asset owners and everyone else.

That's the exact political environment where wealth tax proposals gain traction. Which means the pressure isn't going away.

The irony? The policy designed to close the gap could end up rattling the market that most people's pensions depend on.